Skip to main content

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Marketing

Changes at "Inclusive participation with E-platforms "

Avatar: Nadia Nadia

Title (English)

  • +Inclusive participation with E-platforms

Body (English)

  • +
  • +
    Hypothesis
  • +
    E-democracy platforms can foster inclusive participation and improve deliberation. Their ability to do so is reflected in how well their design aligns with local government's strategies and history of a participatory culture. Using cases of different municipal instances of Decidim differences in inclusion/exclusion arise from how the cities implemented Decidim in relation to local networks and socioeconomic conditions.
  • +
    Context
  • +
  • +
    Case Studies/Examples:
  • +
    Case study 1 in Argentina: https://participa.rosario.gob.ar/conferences/presentacionplataforma
  • +
    Primary Question: State the main question your hypothesis aims to answer
  • +
  • +
    Assumptions
  • +
  • +
    Collaboration
  • +
    Do you have any municipal or regional platforms that have been great for inclusion in the EU? Please share in the comments
  • +
    Methods
  • +
    Literature Review
  • +
    Expected Outcomes:  Describe the expected results if the hypothesis is correct.
  • +
  • +

Confirm

Please log in

The password is too short.

Share