Pagina

Before setting up a digital or hybrid participatory space, organisers should clearly articulate its purpose through an intersectional lens. This means clarifying why the space exists, where it is situated, and what it aims to achieve, while also asking who it is designed for and who it may expose to risk. For example, is the space embedded in a specific context such as a workplace, school, or local community? If so, does that embeddedness enable clearer and more actionable pathways, such as engaging a student union, workers’ representatives, or identifiable decision-makers and policy-makers, rather than abstract or symbolic participation? How might embeddedness reproduce structural discrimination?

Digital and hybrid participation without real influence or outcomes can reproduce harm by extracting labour, amplifying exposure, or raising expectations that cannot be met, especially for marginalised communities. Clear communication about scope, limits, and consequences supports informed consent, builds trust, and helps ensure participation is meaningful rather than symbolic or performative.

Online spaces can be designed as:

• Sites of decision-making or agenda-setting

• Archives of process and accountability

• Spaces for asynchronous participation, recognising uneven availability and limited time

See the system and design with people in mind

Rather than designing for a hypothetical “average participant,” equity-oriented practice asks organisers to start with those most likely to be excluded, particularly in digital spaces where access, confidence, and visibility are uneven.

This means embedding an intersectional lens throughout the process: understanding how overlapping forms of marginalisation shape safety, risk, and participation, and how digital infrastructures can intensify these dynamics (Costanza-Chock, 2020).

In hybrid contexts, organisers should also ask:

• Does the space support asynchronous participation (asynchronous refers to online participation that people can engage in at different times)? How can asynchronous participation redistribute power rather than delay it?

• Does it function as an archive, a site of experimentation, or a mechanism of accountability?

• How is information translated between online and offline moments?

• Who is most likely to be excluded from the digital space?

• What barriers (language, access, confidence, disability, safety) are amplified online?